Akhtar Vs. The State Bar Of Nevada
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ZIA AKHTAR, No. 81055 Petitioner, vs. THE STATE BAR OF NEVADA, FE El Respondent.
MAY 1 5 2020 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK - PROW COURT BY
. • MEM
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION
This pro se petition was docketed in this court on April 22, 2020, without payment of the requisite filing fee. On that same day a notice was issued directing petitioner to pay the filing fee within ten days. The notice further advised that failure to pay the filing fee within ten days without leave to proceed in forma pauperis would result in the dismissal of this petition. To date, petitioner has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, cause appearing, this petition is dismissed.
It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN
(01,\ALL
BY*
cc: Zia Akhtar
State Bar of Nevada/Las Vegas SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER
101-1947 ofilbe.
,2 -13S‘93
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Akhtar Vs. The State Bar Of Nevada (Akhtar Vs. The State Bar Of Nevada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.