Akhtar v. Gonzales

461 F.3d 584
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Akhtar v. Gonzales. Read the opinion of the Court — 450 F.3d 587
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 17, 2006·No. 04-60497·Published

Opinion

461 F.3d 584

Raja AKHTAR; Mohammad Salman, Petitioners,
v.
Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent.

No. 04-60497.

No. 04-60895.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

August 17, 2006.

Peter D. Williamson (argued), Williamson & Chaves, Houston, TX, for Akhtar.

Sarfraz Aftab Sharif (argued), Sharif & Associates, Houston, TX, for Salman.

Jennifer Paisner (argued), David V. Bernal, Thomas Ward Hussey, Dir., Margaret Kuehne Taylor, U.S. Dept. of Justice, OIL, Joshua E. Braunstein, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Imm. Lit., Washington, DC, Caryl G. Thompson, U.S. INS, Attn: Joe A. Aguilar, New Orleans, LA, Sharon A. Hudson, U.S. Citizenship & Imm. Services, Houston, TX, for Gonzales.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Akhtar's petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED and Respondent's motion to remand both cases is GRANTED. Consequently, both cases are REMANDED to the BIA for further consideration in light of 71 Federal Register 27,585 (May 12, 2006).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Akhtar v. Gonzales, 461 F.3d 584 (5th Cir. 2006).

461 F.3d 584 (Akhtar v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.