AKF, Inc. v. M & M Gen. Store, LLC

2024 NY Slip Op 33324(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedSeptember 20, 2024
DocketIndex No. 656097/2023
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 33324(U) (AKF, Inc. v. M & M Gen. Store, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
AKF, Inc. v. M & M Gen. Store, LLC, 2024 NY Slip Op 33324(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2024).

Opinion

AKF, Inc. v M & M Gen. Store, LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 33324(U) September 20, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 656097/2023 Judge: John J. Kelley Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 656097/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/20/2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. JOHN J. KELLEY PART 56M Justice ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 656097/2023 AKF, INC., doing business as FUNDKITE, MOTION DATE 07/12/2024 Petitioner, MOTION SEQ. NO. 001 -v- M & M GENERAL STORE, LLC, doing business as M & M GENERAL STORE, and MOGAMMED ALI MONAWER AL- DECISION, ORDER, AND QWAIDER, JUDGMENT

Respondents. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 were read on this motion to/for CONFIRM/DISAPPROVE AWARD/REPORT .

AKF, Inc., doing business as Fundkite (AKF), petitions pursuant to CPLR 7510 to

confirm an arbitration award dated November 21, 2023, made by an arbitrator acting under the

auspices of the Mediation and Civil Arbitration, Inc. (MCA). The respondents do not oppose the

petition. The petition is granted, the award is confirmed, and the Clerk of the court is directed to

enter a money judgment in favor of AKF and against the respondents, jointly and severally, in

the sum of $48,887.69, plus statutory interest from November 21, 2023.

On June 1, 2023, AKF entered into an agreement with the respondent M & M General

Store, LLC, doing business as M & M General Store (hereinafter M & M), pursuant to which AKF

agreed to purchase $41,322.00 of M & M future receivables for the sum of $29,100.00, less

service fees in the sum of $1,931.00, in consideration for M & M’s future repayment of that sum

plus 10% in annual interest. The agreement presumed a weekly “delivery” amount of $1,475.79

from M & M’s receivables, via an automatic debit from M & M’s bank account, with a monthly

reconciliation. The respondent Mogammed Ali Monawer Al-Qwaider guaranteed M & M’s

obligations under the agreement. The agreement provided for arbitration of any dispute under

656097/2023 AKF INC. vs. M & M GENERAL STORE LLC ET AL Page 1 of 4 Motion No. 001

1 of 4 [* 1] INDEX NO. 656097/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/20/2024

the agreement, including claims that M & M breached the agreement by failing to pay its weekly

delivery.

AKF alleged in its petition that, on June 26, 2023, it received a notice from M & M’s bank

that the scheduled weekly debit of receipts from the designated account was declined because

“Payment [was] Stopped.” AKF further asserted that, as of the date of M & M’s default, M & M

had paid only $2,951.58 of the $41,322.00 ultimately due under the agreement, leaving a

balance of $38,370.42. AKF alleged that it believed that M & M’s principals began “diverting” M

& M’s receipts into other accounts.

On August 1, 2023, AKF served the respondents with a demand for arbitration of its

claim for $47,963.03 against them before MCA, doing business as Rapid Ruling, an arbitral

forum with headquarters in New York, New York, and offices located in Manhasset, New York.

The respondents failed to respond to the demand or appear at the arbitration hearing. In an

award dated November 21, 2023, the arbitrator agreed with AKF’s contentions, and awarded

AKF the principal sum of $38,370.42, plus liquidated default fees in the sum of $9,592.61, along

with attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses in the sum of $924.66, inclusive of fees, costs and

expenses that were incurred in “pursuing this [arbitration] proceeding and [an] ancillary court

proceeding brought in anticipation of this arbitration,” as required by the agreement, for a total

award of $48,887.69.

Pursuant to CPLR 7510, the court “shall confirm an [arbitration] award upon application

of a party made within one year after its delivery to him [or her] unless the award is vacated or

modified upon a ground specified in section 7511.” Since the arbitration involved here is

consensual, rather than compulsory, the award may only be vacated if the court finds that the

rights of a party were prejudiced by:

“(i) corruption, fraud or misconduct in procuring the award; or (ii) partiality of an arbitrator appointed as a neutral, except where the award was by confession; or (iii) an arbitrator, or agency or person making the award exceeded his power or so imperfectly executed it that a final and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made; or (iv) failure to follow the procedure of this article, 656097/2023 AKF INC. vs. M & M GENERAL STORE LLC ET AL Page 2 of 4 Motion No. 001

2 of 4 [* 2] INDEX NO. 656097/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/20/2024

unless the party applying to vacate the award continued with the arbitration with notice of the defect and without objection”

(CPLR 7511[b][1]). The grounds specified in CPLR 7511 for vacatur of an arbitration award are

exclusive (see Bernstein Family Ltd. Partnership v Sovereign Partners, L.P., 66 AD3d 1, 8 [1st

Dept 2009]), and it is a “well-established rule that an arbitrator’s rulings, unlike a trial court’s, are

largely unreviewable” (Matter of Falzone v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 15 NY3d 530, 534

[2013]). AKF petitioned to confirm the award on December 5, 2023 and, thus, its application

was timely made. AKF contends that the award was proper in all respects and that no grounds

exist for modification or vacatur.

The court agrees with AKF, and concludes that AKF is entitled both to the confirmation

of the award, and the entry of a money judgment in the sum of $48,887.69, as awarded by the

arbitrator.

The total award must bear interest from the date of the arbitration award, that is, from

November 21, 2023 (see CPLR 5002; Board of Educ. of Cent. School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of

Niagara, Wheatfield, Lewiston & Cambria v Niagara-Wheatfield Teachers Assn., 46 NY2d 553,

558 [1979]; Dermigny v Harper, 127 AD3d 685, 686 [2d Dept 2015]; Matter of Levin & Glasser,

P.C. v Kenmore Prop., LLC, 70 AD3d 443, 446 [1st Dept 2010]; Matter of Gruberg v Cortell

Group, Inc., 143 AD2d 39, 39 [1st Dept 1988]).

Accordingly, it is,

ADJUDGED that the petition is granted, and the arbitration award rendered in the matter

entitled Matter of AKF, Inc. v M & M General Store, LLC, etc., et ano., Mediation and Civil

Arbitration, Inc., Case Number 44965/2023, dated November 21, 2023, be, and hereby is,

confirmed; and it is further,

ORDERED that the Clerk of the court shall enter a money judgment in favor of the

petitioner, AKF, Inc., doing business as Fundkite, and against the respondents, M & M General

Store, LLC, doing business as M & M General Store, and Mogammed Ali Monawer Al-Qwaider,

656097/2023 AKF INC. vs. M & M GENERAL STORE LLC ET AL Page 3 of 4 Motion No. 001

3 of 4 [* 3] INDEX NO. 656097/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/20/2024

jointly and severally, in the principal sum of $48,887.69, plus statutory prejudgment interest at

the rate of 9% per annum thereon from November 21, 2023.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Education v. Niagara-Wheatfield Teachers Ass'n
389 N.E.2d 104 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
Dermigny v. Harper
127 A.D.3d 685 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
In re the Arbitration between Falzone & New York Mutual Fire Insurance
939 N.E.2d 1197 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)
Levin & Glasser, P.C. v. Kenmore Property, LLC
70 A.D.3d 443 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In re the Arbitration between Gruberg & Cortell Group, Inc.
143 A.D.2d 39 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 33324(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akf-inc-v-m-m-gen-store-llc-nysupctnewyork-2024.