Akers v. Scofield

73 F. Supp. 553, 36 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 257, 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2122
CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Texas
DecidedSeptember 20, 1947
DocketCivil Action No. 190
StatusPublished

This text of 73 F. Supp. 553 (Akers v. Scofield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Akers v. Scofield, 73 F. Supp. 553, 36 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 257, 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2122 (W.D. Tex. 1947).

Opinion

RICE, District Judge.

This is a suit for refund of income taxes paid by plaintiffs.

The sole question here presented is whether money received by a self-confessed swindler from his victim, an eighty-two year old widow, is income to him and taxable as such.

The facts were stipulated and are found to be as follows:

I. Plaintiffs, James A. Akers and Lela Akers, his wife, reside in Bexar County, Texas.

II. Defendant, Frank Scofield, is the Collector of Internal Revenue for the First District of Texas, with his office in Austin, Texas, and has at all times germane to this action acted in his official capacity as such Collector, and is the Collector to whom the tax for which this suit is brought was paid.

III. On January 22, 1940, an indictment was returned by the Grand Jury of the Austin Division of this District charging in the First Count thereof that on or about March 15, 1934, James A. Akers unlawfully and wilfully attempted to evade income tax in the amount of $1,354.90 on account of net taxable income in the amount of $18,135 received by him during the calendar year 1933. The Fourth Count of said indictment charged that on or about March 15, 1937, the defendant unlawfully and wilfully attempted to evade income tax in the amount of $572.05 on account of the net taxable income in the amount of $18,615.54 received by him during the calendar year [554]*5541936. The Second and Third Counts of said indictment charged similar violations for evading income taxes based upon net taxable income received by him during the calendar years 1934 and 1935, respectively. On January 31, 1940, the defendant entered his plea of guilty to the First and Fourth Counts of said indictment, whereupon the Second and Third Counts were dismissed.

On January 31, 1940, the court sentenced the defendant as follows: On the First Count: $10,000 fine, for the payment of which the defendant stood committed, and two years in an institution of the penitentiary type; on the Fourth Count: $5,000 fine and two years in an institution of the penitentiary type, the sentence under the Fourth Count to run consecutively with that imposed under the First Count. The entire sentence under the Fourth Count was suspended for two years on the condition that the defendant not attempt to transfer title of any of his property until his tax liability with the Government was settled, and that he make a full, fair disclosure of his affairs and assets to the Internal Revenue Agents.

IV. The instant action is one for the recovery of income taxes paid for the years 1932, 1933 and 1936 in the following amounts:

1932 .......................... $ 540.66
1933 .......................... 571.67
1936 .......................... 1400.53
Total ................. $2512.86

The following schedule sets out the date the Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed income taxes, the amounts of same, the date and amounts paid on the taxes so assessed:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

North American Oil Consolidated v. Burnet
286 U.S. 417 (Supreme Court, 1932)
Commissioner v. Wilcox
327 U.S. 404 (Supreme Court, 1946)
Caldwell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
135 F.2d 488 (Fifth Circuit, 1943)
Kurrle v. Helvering
126 F.2d 723 (Eighth Circuit, 1942)
McKnight v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
127 F.2d 572 (Fifth Circuit, 1942)
National City Bank of New York v. Helvering
98 F.2d 93 (Second Circuit, 1938)
Barker v. Magruder
95 F.2d 122 (D.C. Circuit, 1938)
United States v. Wampler
5 F. Supp. 796 (D. Maryland, 1934)
Gordon v. State
214 S.W. 980 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1919)
Bink v. State
98 S.W. 863 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1906)
Lewis v. State
171 S.W. 217 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)
State v. Vickery
19 Tex. 326 (Texas Supreme Court, 1857)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 F. Supp. 553, 36 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 257, 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akers-v-scofield-txwd-1947.