Akers v. Director of Bureau of Labor Standards

506 A.2d 220, 1986 Me. LEXIS 715
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided March 10, 1986·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

The appellants, all former employees of the Wyandotte Mill in Waterville, appeal from a judgment in Superior Court, Kenne-bec County, granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) M.R. Civ.P.

The issue on appeal is whether vacation, retirement and severence pay benefits, earned from a now insolvent employer are compensable to former employees out of the Maine Wage Assurance Fund, 26 M.R. S.A. § 632 (Supp.1985). We recently deter[221] mined in Seeley v. Director of Bureau of Labor Standards, 505 A.2d 95 (Me.1986), that 26 M.R.S.A. § 632 cannot be interpreted to include fringe benefits within the meaning of the term “wages”. Our reasoning in Seeley is fully applicable to the instant case.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Akers v. Director of Bureau of Labor Standards, 506 A.2d 220, 1986 Me. LEXIS 715 (Me. 1986).

506 A.2d 220 (Akers v. Director of Bureau of Labor Standards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seeley v. Director of Bureau of Labor Standards
505 A.2d 95 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1986)