Akers v. Corbett

190 So. 31, 138 Fla. 737, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1482
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 23, 1939
StatusPublished

This text of 190 So. 31 (Akers v. Corbett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Akers v. Corbett, 190 So. 31, 138 Fla. 737, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1482 (Fla. 1939).

Opinion

Per Cur.am. —

This cause having been submitted upon the transcript of the record and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, all of which have been duly considered, it is ordered that the order of the court below be, and the same is, hereby reversed upon authority of the case of Anne Mattison Akers v. L. O. Corbett, et al., this' day decided. (Page 730 of this Report:)

Reversed.

So ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Chapman, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Whitfield and Brown not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of-1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 So. 31, 138 Fla. 737, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akers-v-corbett-fla-1939.