Akerman v. Neel
70 Ga. 728
Opinion
Proper service of the bill of exceptions must appear from an entry in dorsed upon or annexed thereto. When there is no entry whatever indorsed upon' or attached to the bill of exceptions showing service, parol statements cannot be heard in this court for the purpose of showing that service was perfected. Code, §4259; 44 Ga., 652; 45 lb., 316; 59 lb., 666; 63 15., 626.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Akerman v. Neel, 70 Ga. 728 (Ga. 1883).
70 Ga. 728 (Akerman v. Neel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnston v. First National Bank
138 S.E.2d 670 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Williams v. North Carolina Mutual Life Insurance
130 S.E.2d 836 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Ginn v. Ginn
42 S.E.2d 923 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Johnson v. McKelvin
105 S.E. 600 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921)
Robinson v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance
98 S.E. 463 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)
Brantley v. McArthur
64 S.E. 326 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Smith & Co. v. Hirsch & Co.
46 S.E. 637 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Crow v. State
36 S.E. 858 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)