Akerman v. Neel
70 Ga. 728
This text of 70 Ga. 728 (Akerman v. Neel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Akerman v. Neel, 70 Ga. 728 (Ga. 1883).
Opinion
Proper service of the bill of exceptions must appear from an entry in dorsed upon or annexed thereto. When there is no entry whatever indorsed upon' or attached to the bill of exceptions showing service, parol statements cannot be heard in this court for the purpose of showing that service was perfected. Code, §4259; 44 Ga., 652; 45 lb., 316; 59 lb., 666; 63 15., 626.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Johnston v. First National Bank
138 S.E.2d 670 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Williams v. North Carolina Mutual Life Insurance
130 S.E.2d 836 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Ginn v. Ginn
42 S.E.2d 923 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Johnson v. McKelvin
105 S.E. 600 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921)
Robinson v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance
98 S.E. 463 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)
Brantley v. McArthur
64 S.E. 326 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Smith & Co. v. Hirsch & Co.
46 S.E. 637 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Crow v. State
36 S.E. 858 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
70 Ga. 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akerman-v-neel-ga-1883.