Akerman v. Nathan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Akerman v. Nathan

236 A.D. 812

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 236 A.D. 812 (Akerman v. Nathan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Akerman v. Nathan, 236 A.D. 812 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion for judgment on the pleadings affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. The essential factor presented by the complaint and the bill of particulars is the sale by the defendants under a judgment which had previously been satisfied. Order bringing in an additional party defendant affirmed. In the circumstances, it may properly be left to the new party defendant to move with respect to the amended or supplemental complaint if so advised. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion for judgment on the pleadings affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. The essential factor presented by the complaint and the bill of particulars is the sale by the defendants under a judgment which had previously been satisfied. Order bringing in an additional party defendant affirmed. In the circumstances, it may properly be left to the new party defendant to move with respect to the amended or supplemental complaint if so advised. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 A.D. 812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akerman-v-nathan-nyappdiv-1932.