Akerman v. Akerman

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Akerman v. Akerman

51 A. 252, 71 N.H. 55, 1901 N.H. LEXIS 13

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedSeptember 13, 1901

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 51 A. 252 (Akerman v. Akerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Akerman v. Akerman, 51 A. 252, 71 N.H. 55, 1901 N.H. LEXIS 13 (N.H. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Blodgett, C. J.

The rulmg at the trial term was correct. By the express terms of the will itself the estate is vested finally in Joseph’s children and grandchildren “at his death.” The plaintiffs alone answer the description in the will, and consequently take the estate to the exclusion of the defendant, who was not born until more than three years after Joseph’s decease.

Decree for the plaintiffs.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blodgett, C. J.

The rulmg at the trial term was correct. By the express terms of the will itself the estate is vested finally in Joseph’s children and grandchildren “at his death.” The plaintiffs alone answer the description in the will, and consequently take the estate to the exclusion of the defendant, who was not born until more than three years after Joseph’s decease.

Decree for the plaintiffs.

All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A. 252, 71 N.H. 55, 1901 N.H. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akerman-v-akerman-nh-1901.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack