Akerman v. Akerman

51 A. 252, 71 N.H. 55, 1901 N.H. LEXIS 13
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided September 13, 1901·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Blodgett, C. J.

The rulmg at the trial term was correct. By the express terms of the will itself the estate is vested finally in Joseph’s children and grandchildren “at his death.” The plaintiffs alone answer the description in the will, and consequently take the estate to the exclusion of the defendant, who was not born until more than three years after Joseph’s decease.

Decree for the plaintiffs.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Akerman v. Akerman, 51 A. 252, 71 N.H. 55, 1901 N.H. LEXIS 13 (N.H. 1901).

51 A. 252 (Akerman v. Akerman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Realty Co. v. Bernard
6 Teiss. 387 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1909)