Aker v. State

5 Ind. 193
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 2, 1854
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Ind. 193 (Aker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aker v. State, 5 Ind. 193 (Ind. 1854).

Opinion

Stuart, J.

This cause, brought here on an agreed state of facts, presents the same question decided in Maize v. [194]*194The State, 4 Ind. R. 342. For the reasons there given, the same judgment follows.

B. McClelland, for the appellant. R. A. Riley, N. B. Taylor and J. Coburn, for the state.

Per Curiam.—The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Ind. 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aker-v-state-ind-1854.