Aker v. Neiber
This text of 2016 ND 47 (Aker v. Neiber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 3/3/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2016 ND 47
Paul W. Aker, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Diane C. Neiber,
f.k.a. Diane C. Aker, Defendant and Appellee
No. 20150229
Appeal from the District Court of Richland County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Bradley Allen Cruff, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Amy M. Clark, 321 Dakota Avenue, P.O. Box 38, Wahpeton, N.D. 58074-0038, and John M. Wilka, 300 North Dakota Avenue, Suite 510, Sioux Falls, S.D. 57104, for plaintiff and appellant; submitted on brief.
Samuel S. Johnson, 205 Seventh Street North, P.O. Box 5, Wahpeton, N.D. 58074-0005, for defendant and appellee; submitted on brief.
Aker v. Neiber
[¶1] Paul Aker appeals a district court order denying his motion to amend parenting time. Aker claims the ongoing conflict between the parties constitutes a material change of circumstances warranting modification, and amending parenting time is in the best interests of the children. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court did not err in finding no material change of circumstances warranting modification of parenting time.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2016 ND 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aker-v-neiber-nd-2016.