Aker v. Fort Wayne Urology Corp.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Aker v. Fort Wayne Urology Corp.

562 N.E.2d 751, 1990 Ind. App. LEXIS 1459, 1990 WL 180575

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 19, 1990

DocketNo. 02A03-9003-CV-79

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 562 N.E.2d 751 (Aker v. Fort Wayne Urology Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aker v. Fort Wayne Urology Corp., 562 N.E.2d 751, 1990 Ind. App. LEXIS 1459, 1990 WL 180575 (Ind. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinions

HOFFMAN, Presiding Judge.

Appellant Bonnie Aker appeals a summary judgment in favor of Fort Wayne Urology Corporation. The facts indicate that Fort Wayne Urology provided medical services for Bonnie Aker's husband, Richard Aker, in September 1988. Richard Aker died in January 1989 and all of his property transferred to his wife, Bonnie Aker. Fort Wayne Urology sought judgment against Bonnie Aker in small claims court on May 23, 1989. On January 26, 1990, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Fort Wayne Urology in the amount of $981.70.

Appellant admitted that no genuine issue of fact exists and this matter should be [752]*752decided as a matter of law. Appellant contends Indiana law should be reformulated.

The rule governing this case states:

"'The spouse incurring the medical expenses, whether husband or wife, is primarily liable for those expenses. If the property of that spouse should prove insufficient, then the financial resources of the marital relationship [are] secondarily liable for those expenses." Memorial Hospital v. Hahaj (1982), Ind.App., 430 N.E.2d 412, 416. See also Allstate Ins. Co. v. Boles (S.D.Ind.1984), 587 F.Supp. 807, 813.

This means that a creditor must first seek satisfaction from the income and property of the spouse who incurred the debt. Only if those resources are insufficient may a creditor seek satisfaction from the other income and property of the marital relationship. South Bend Clinic v. Estate of Ruffing (1986), Ind.App., 501 N.E.2d 1114, 1116.

In this case, Richard Aker incurred debt from medical treatment; after he died, all of his property transferred to his wife, Bonnie Aker, who is secondarily liable for the incurred medical debt of her deceased husband. Appellant's argument for a change in the law is unpersuasive.

Affirmed.

STATON, J., concurs. CHEZEM, J., concurs with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOFFMAN, Presiding Judge.

Appellant Bonnie Aker appeals a summary judgment in favor of Fort Wayne Urology Corporation. The facts indicate that Fort Wayne Urology provided medical services for Bonnie Aker's husband, Richard Aker, in September 1988. Richard Aker died in January 1989 and all of his property transferred to his wife, Bonnie Aker. Fort Wayne Urology sought judgment against Bonnie Aker in small claims court on May 23, 1989. On January 26, 1990, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Fort Wayne Urology in the amount of $981.70.

Appellant admitted that no genuine issue of fact exists and this matter should be [752]*752decided as a matter of law. Appellant contends Indiana law should be reformulated.

The rule governing this case states:

"'The spouse incurring the medical expenses, whether husband or wife, is primarily liable for those expenses. If the property of that spouse should prove insufficient, then the financial resources of the marital relationship [are] secondarily liable for those expenses." Memorial Hospital v. Hahaj (1982), Ind.App., 430 N.E.2d 412, 416. See also Allstate Ins. Co. v. Boles (S.D.Ind.1984), 587 F.Supp. 807, 813.

This means that a creditor must first seek satisfaction from the income and property of the spouse who incurred the debt. Only if those resources are insufficient may a creditor seek satisfaction from the other income and property of the marital relationship. South Bend Clinic v. Estate of Ruffing (1986), Ind.App., 501 N.E.2d 1114, 1116.

In this case, Richard Aker incurred debt from medical treatment; after he died, all of his property transferred to his wife, Bonnie Aker, who is secondarily liable for the incurred medical debt of her deceased husband. Appellant's argument for a change in the law is unpersuasive.

Affirmed.

STATON, J., concurs. CHEZEM, J., concurs with opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

562 N.E.2d 751, 1990 Ind. App. LEXIS 1459, 1990 WL 180575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aker-v-fort-wayne-urology-corp-indctapp-1990.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack