Aker Kvaerner/Ihi v. National Union Fire Insurance

Fifth Circuit

Aker Kvaerner/Ihi v. National Union Fire Insurance

599 F. App'x 208

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 10, 2015

DocketNo. 14-30208

StatusPublished

This text of 599 F. App'x 208 (Aker Kvaerner/Ihi v. National Union Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aker Kvaerner/Ihi v. National Union Fire Insurance, 599 F. App'x 208 (5th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

*

Having considered the parties’ briefs and the supplemental letter briefs filed pursuant to our directive, we DISMISS this case because the order compelling arbitration is an interlocutory order over which we lack appellate jurisdiction under the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 9 U.S.C. §§ 201-08, and the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16. See Sw. Elec. Power Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London, 772 F.3d 884 (5th Cir.2014). The motion to amend appellate caption is DENIED as moot.

[209]*209APPEAL DISMISSED; CASE REMANDED (to district court); MOTION DENIED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

*

Having considered the parties’ briefs and the supplemental letter briefs filed pursuant to our directive, we DISMISS this case because the order compelling arbitration is an interlocutory order over which we lack appellate jurisdiction under the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 9 U.S.C. §§ 201-08, and the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16. See Sw. Elec. Power Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London, 772 F.3d 884 (5th Cir.2014). The motion to amend appellate caption is DENIED as moot.

[209]*209APPEAL DISMISSED; CASE REMANDED (to district court); MOTION DENIED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

599 F. App'x 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aker-kvaernerihi-v-national-union-fire-insurance-ca5-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack