Akel v. United States

Supreme Court

Akel v. United States

137 S. Ct. 1432, 197 L. Ed. 2d 644, 85 U.S.L.W. 3466, 2017 WL 1199456, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 2312

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 3, 2017

DocketNo. 16–6032.

StatusPublished

This text of 137 S. Ct. 1432 (Akel v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Akel v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 1432, 197 L. Ed. 2d 644, 85 U.S.L.W. 3466, 2017 WL 1199456, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 2312 (U.S. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Mathis v. United States, 579 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 2243, 195 L.Ed.2d 604 (2016).

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Mathis v. United States, 579 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 2243, 195 L.Ed.2d 604 (2016).

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 S. Ct. 1432, 197 L. Ed. 2d 644, 85 U.S.L.W. 3466, 2017 WL 1199456, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 2312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akel-v-united-states-scotus-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack