Akel v. State
737 So. 2d 633, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10044, 1999 WL 546985
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 29, 1999·No. No. 99-1799·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because the appellant’s direct appeal was pending at the time the motion was filed and, in fact, is still pending in this court, the trial court was without jurisdiction to consider the motion. We therefore vacate the trial court order. [634]*634See Daniels v. State, 712 So.2d 765 (Fla. 1998).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Akel v. State, 737 So. 2d 633, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10044, 1999 WL 546985 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
737 So. 2d 633 (Akel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Edwards v. State
796 So. 2d 569 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)