Akbari v. Arrow Ins. Management, Inc.

949 F.2d 401, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 31697, 1991 WL 261653
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedNovember 29, 1991
Docket90-1305
StatusPublished

This text of 949 F.2d 401 (Akbari v. Arrow Ins. Management, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Akbari v. Arrow Ins. Management, Inc., 949 F.2d 401, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 31697, 1991 WL 261653 (10th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

949 F.2d 401

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Sultan H. AKBARI, individually, and as Assignee of Sid Wise
in his capacity as City Attorney of Idaho Springs,
Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ARROW INSURANCE MANAGEMENT, INC.; Public Entities National
Company; and Hartford Fire Insurance Company,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-1305.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Nov. 29, 1991.

Before SEYMOUR and STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and BRATTON,* District Judge.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT**

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Sultan H. Akbari appeals from summary judgment granted to defendants Arrow Insurance Management, Inc., Public Entities National Company, and Hartford Fire Insurance Company on the grounds of res judicata. We have reviewed the arguments plaintiff raises on appeal, and we are not persuaded that the district court erred.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

The Honorable Howard C. Bratton, District Judge, United States District Court for the District of New Mexico, sitting by designation

**

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
949 F.2d 401, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 31697, 1991 WL 261653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akbari-v-arrow-ins-management-inc-ca10-1991.