Akbar v. New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Akbar v. New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission

304 A.D.2d 306, 756 N.Y.S.2d 741, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3411

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 304 A.D.2d 306 (Akbar v. New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Akbar v. New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission, 304 A.D.2d 306, 756 N.Y.S.2d 741, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3411 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of respondent New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission (TLC), dated December 4, 2001, inter alia, revoking petitioner’s taxi driver’s license, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Richard Braun, J.], entered May 7, 2002), dismissed, without costs.

Respondent’s determination revoking petitioner’s license upon findings that petitioner offered a bribe to a TLC taxi dispatcher, committed an act that was against the best interests of the public, and crashed an airport taxi line is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 233 [1974]).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Rosenberger and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of respondent New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission (TLC), dated December 4, 2001, inter alia, revoking petitioner’s taxi driver’s license, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Richard Braun, J.], entered May 7, 2002), dismissed, without costs.

Respondent’s determination revoking petitioner’s license upon findings that petitioner offered a bribe to a TLC taxi dispatcher, committed an act that was against the best interests of the public, and crashed an airport taxi line is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 233 [1974]).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Rosenberger and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

304 A.D.2d 306, 756 N.Y.S.2d 741, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akbar-v-new-york-city-taxi-limousine-commission-nyappdiv-2003.