Akane Corp. v. Fujimichi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Akane Corp. v. Fujimichi

184 A.D.2d 300, 587 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7855

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 11, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 184 A.D.2d 300 (Akane Corp. v. Fujimichi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Akane Corp. v. Fujimichi, 184 A.D.2d 300, 587 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered March 19, 1991, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on its cause of action for conversion of the proceeds of four checks in the amount of $35,612.01, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The affidavit, affirmations and documentary proof submitted by plaintiff were sufficient to demonstrate, prima facie, a cause of action for conversion. In opposition to the motion, defendant submitted only the affirmation of her attorney, who neither demonstrated personal knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the negotiation of the checks nor submitted evidentiary proof to rebut plaintiff’s claim. Since this affirmation is without probative value, it does not serve to [301]*301rebut plaintiff's prima facie case, and plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment was therefore properly granted. (See, Oquendo v Rosgro Realty Corp., 117 AD2d 528, 529.) Concur — Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Kassal and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered March 19, 1991, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on its cause of action for conversion of the proceeds of four checks in the amount of $35,612.01, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The affidavit, affirmations and documentary proof submitted by plaintiff were sufficient to demonstrate, prima facie, a cause of action for conversion. In opposition to the motion, defendant submitted only the affirmation of her attorney, who neither demonstrated personal knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the negotiation of the checks nor submitted evidentiary proof to rebut plaintiff’s claim. Since this affirmation is without probative value, it does not serve to [301]*301rebut plaintiff's prima facie case, and plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment was therefore properly granted. (See, Oquendo v Rosgro Realty Corp., 117 AD2d 528, 529.) Concur — Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Kassal and Smith, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 A.D.2d 300, 587 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akane-corp-v-fujimichi-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack