Akana v. Espinda

Hawaii Supreme Court

Akana v. Espinda

33 Haw. 314, 1935 Haw. LEXIS 40

CourtHawaii Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 18, 1935

DocketNo. 2142.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 Haw. 314 (Akana v. Espinda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Akana v. Espinda, 33 Haw. 314, 1935 Haw. LEXIS 40 (haw 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record in this case discloses that there was a money judgment against the defendant, the plaintiff in error, in the court below, that the same is un *315 satisfied and that no bond for the payment of the judgment was filed with the clerk of this court prior to or at the time of the issuance of the writ of error by the clerk. Under the authority of IP. Au Hoy v. Ching Mun Shee, ante p. 240, this court is without jurisdiction and the writ of error is therefore dismissed.

G. B. Dwight for plaintiff in error, J. 8. Ferry for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The record in this case discloses that there was a money judgment against the defendant, the plaintiff in error, in the court below, that the same is un *315 satisfied and that no bond for the payment of the judgment was filed with the clerk of this court prior to or at the time of the issuance of the writ of error by the clerk. Under the authority of IP. Au Hoy v. Ching Mun Shee, ante p. 240, this court is without jurisdiction and the writ of error is therefore dismissed.

G. B. Dwight for plaintiff in error, J. 8. Ferry for defendant in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Haw. 314, 1935 Haw. LEXIS 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akana-v-espinda-haw-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack