A.K. v. State

439 So. 2d 335, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24595
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 18, 1983·No. No. 83-398·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A.K. appeals an adjudication of delinquency and alleges as error that the evidence was insufficient to establish his guilt as an aider and abettor under section 777.-011, Florida Statutes (1981). We agree that the evidence was insufficient and accordingly reverse and remand with directions to discharge the defendant.

The evidence adduced at trial showed that A.K. and another youth approached an automobile and looked into its window. A.K.’s companion then motioned him to cross the street, which A.K. did. The youth who remained by the automobile removed a book therefrom and re-joined A.K. The two youths were subsequently apprehended. We find the facts in this case indistinguishable from those in J.L.B. v. State, 396 So.2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), and reverse upon that authority and upon the authority of [336] G.C. v. State, 407 So.2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Reversed and remanded with directions to discharge the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A.K. v. State, 439 So. 2d 335, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24595 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

439 So. 2d 335 (A.K. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

T.L.F. v. State
467 So. 2d 798 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)