Ajs v. Krc
This text of 348 S.W.3d 829 (Ajs v. Krc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A.J.S., individually and as next friend for K.R.C., Petitioners,
v.
K.R.C., Respondent, and
State of Missouri, Department of Social Services, Family Support Division, Intervenor/Appellant.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Anne M. Zemenick, Assistant Attorney General, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Adam J. Statler, Farmington, MO, Petitioner Acting pro se.
Kasey R. Cooper, Ste. Genevieve, MO, Respondent Acting pro se.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The Department of Social Services, Family Support Division, appeals from the trial court's judgment denying its post-judgment motion to intervene in a paternity action. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
348 S.W.3d 829, 2011 WL 4373932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ajs-v-krc-moctapp-2011.