Ajinomoto Co., Inc. v. CJ Cheiljedang Corp.

S.D. New York

Ajinomoto Co., Inc. v. CJ Cheiljedang Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 8, 2022·No. 1:16-cv-03498·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 2/8/2022 AJINOMOTO CoO., INC. and AJINOMOTO HEARTLAND INC., Plaintiff, 1:16-cv-03498-MKV -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL CJ CHEILJEDANG CORP., CJ AMERICA, INC., and PT CHEILJEDANG INDONESIA, Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court has been advised that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by March 8, 2022. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. | i / . Date: February 8, 2022 MARY chy viscid New York, NY United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 2/8/2022 AJINOMOTO CoO., INC. and AJINOMOTO HEARTLAND INC., Plaintiff, 1:16-cv-03498-MKV -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL CJ CHEILJEDANG CORP., CJ AMERICA, INC., and PT CHEILJEDANG INDONESIA, Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court has been advised that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by March 8, 2022. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. | i / . Date: February 8, 2022 MARY chy viscid New York, NY United States District Judge

Ajinomoto Co., Inc. v. CJ Cheiljedang Corp., (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Pincite

Ajinomoto Co., Inc. v. CJ Cheiljedang Corp. (Ajinomoto Co., Inc. v. CJ Cheiljedang Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related