Aj v. Skojec

Fourth Circuit

Aj v. Skojec

161 F. App'x 283

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 5, 2006·No. No. 05-1419·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss Appellants’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action, and awarding attorneys fees to Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See AJ v. Skojec, No. CA-04-4069-1-AMD (D. Md. Feb. 22 & Apr. [284]*28422, 2005). We deny Appellants’ motion for an injunction as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss Appellants’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action, and awarding attorneys fees to Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See AJ v. Skojec, No. CA-04-4069-1-AMD (D. Md. Feb. 22 & Apr. [284]*28422, 2005). We deny Appellants’ motion for an injunction as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Aj v. Skojec, 161 F. App'x 283 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

161 F. App'x 283 (Aj v. Skojec) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related