Aiyekusibe v. The Hertz Corporation

District Court, M.D. Florida·Decided March 6, 2020·No. 2:18-cv-00816·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

BAMIDELE AIYEKUSIBE, MISCHELE HIGGINSON and SHANTAL BROWN- WINN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No.: 2:18-cv-816-FtM-38MRM

THE HERTZ CORPORATION and DTG OPERATIONS, INC.,

Defendants. / ORDER1 Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”). (Doc. 122). Judge McCoy recommends denying Plaintiffs’ motion to toll the statute of limitations. Neither party objected, and the matter is ripe. A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732, 732 (11th Cir. 1982). Without a specific objection, the judge need not review factual findings de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993). But the district court reviews legal conclusions de novo, even without an objection. Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994).

1 Disclaimer: Documents hyperlinked to CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By using hyperlinks, the Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide, nor does it have any agreements with them. The Court is also not responsible for a hyperlink’s availability and functionality, and a failed hyperlink does not affect this Order. After a careful, complete, and independent examination of the file, the Court accepts and adopts Judge McCoy’s R&R in full. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 122) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. 2. Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Equitable Tolling of Statute of Limitations (Doc. 113) is DENIED. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 6th day of March, 2020.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Parties of Record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aiyekusibe v. The Hertz Corporation, (M.D. Fla. 2020).

Aiyekusibe v. The Hertz Corporation (Aiyekusibe v. The Hertz Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marina Cooper-Houston v. Southern Railway Company
37 F.3d 603 (Eleventh Circuit, 1994)
Garvey v. Vaughn
993 F.2d 776 (Eleventh Circuit, 1993)