Aitken v. Quinn, Dixon
This text of Aitken v. Quinn, Dixon (Aitken v. Quinn, Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2025-2446 _____________________________
STEVEN MICHAEL AITKEN,
Petitioner,
v.
R. QUINN, WARDEN, Santa Rosa Correctional Facility; RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,
Respondents. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Proceedings.
November 17, 2025
PER CURIAM.
DENIED.
LEWIS, RAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Steven A. Aitken, pro se, Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Aitken v. Quinn, Dixon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aitken-v-quinn-dixon-fladistctapp-2025.