Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Aitken v. Gajadha

Aitken v. Gajadha

636 So. 2d 766, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2617, 1994 WL 90543
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 23, 1994·No. No. 93-0078·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We withdraw our prior opinion and substitute the following in its place.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration of attorney’s fees under section 768.79, Florida Statutes (1989), in light of Schmidt v. Fortner, 629 So.2d 1036 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Contra: Bridges v. Newton, 556 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Affirmed as to the denial of the award under section 45.061, Florida Statutes (1989).

.WARNER, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aitken v. Gajadha, 636 So. 2d 766, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2617, 1994 WL 90543 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

636 So. 2d 766 (Aitken v. Gajadha) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bridges v. Newton
556 So. 2d 1170 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Schmidt v. Fortner
629 So. 2d 1036 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)