Aitken v. Gajadha

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Aitken v. Gajadha

636 So. 2d 766, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2617, 1994 WL 90543

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 23, 1994

DocketNo. 93-0078

StatusPublished

This text of 636 So. 2d 766 (Aitken v. Gajadha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aitken v. Gajadha, 636 So. 2d 766, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2617, 1994 WL 90543 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We withdraw our prior opinion and substitute the following in its place.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration of attorney’s fees under section 768.79, Florida Statutes (1989), in light of Schmidt v. Fortner, 629 So.2d 1036 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Contra: Bridges v. Newton, 556 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Affirmed as to the denial of the award under section 45.061, Florida Statutes (1989).

.WARNER, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI