Airth v. City of Live Oak

169 So. 646, 125 Fla. 155, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1247
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided August 3, 1936·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This is an appeal from a decree dismissing a bill of complaint seeking to enjoin the issue of $37,000.00 of Water Revenue Certificates by the City of Live Oak, Florida, without an approving vote of the freeholder elect-tors of the City as required by Section 6, Article IX, of the Constitution, of Florida, as amended in 1930, the purpose of the issue being for improvements to the existing waterworks system of the City of Live Oak.

The Water Revenue Certificates are to be paid solely from the revenue derived from the operation of the said waterworks system and not otherwise.

The decree dismissing the bill of complaint should be affirmed upon the authority of State, ex rel., v. City of Miami, *156 113 Fla. 280, 52 So. 6; State v. City of Daytona Beach, 118 Fla. 29, 158 So. 200; Boykin v. Town of River Junction; State, ex rel. City of Vero Beach, v. MacConnell; Williams v. Town of Dunnellon; Bradley v. City of Homestead and other like cases filed at this term.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Airth v. City of Live Oak, 169 So. 646, 125 Fla. 155, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1247 (Fla. 1936).

169 So. 646 (Airth v. City of Live Oak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. City of Deland
185 So. 343 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
State v. City of Pensacola
184 So. 768 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Brooks v. City of Jacksonville
173 So. 365 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)