Airline Professionals Ass'n Teamsters Local Union No. 1224 v. ABX Air, Inc.

Sixth Circuit

Airline Professionals Ass'n Teamsters Local Union No. 1224 v. ABX Air, Inc.

106 F. App'x 990

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedAugust 24, 2004

DocketNo. 03-3722

StatusPublished

This text of 106 F. App'x 990 (Airline Professionals Ass'n Teamsters Local Union No. 1224 v. ABX Air, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Airline Professionals Ass'n Teamsters Local Union No. 1224 v. ABX Air, Inc., 106 F. App'x 990 (6th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having studied the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are not persuaded that the District Court erred in granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The District Court was clearly correct in determining that the dispute between the parties constitutes a “minor dispute” under the Railway Labor Act and is subject to mandatory arbitration. Because the reasons supporting this conclusion have been fully articulated by the District Court, the issuance of a detailed opinion by this Court is unnecessary. Finally, in affirming the District Court’s decision, this court expresses no opinion on the merits of the Appellant’s case as it proceeds to arbitration. The judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having studied the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are not persuaded that the District Court erred in granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The District Court was clearly correct in determining that the dispute between the parties constitutes a “minor dispute” under the Railway Labor Act and is subject to mandatory arbitration. Because the reasons supporting this conclusion have been fully articulated by the District Court, the issuance of a detailed opinion by this Court is unnecessary. Finally, in affirming the District Court’s decision, this court expresses no opinion on the merits of the Appellant’s case as it proceeds to arbitration. The judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 F. App'x 990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/airline-professionals-assn-teamsters-local-union-no-1224-v-abx-air-inc-ca6-2004.