Airline Cleaning & Maintenance Service, Inc. v. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc.

305 A.D.2d 523, 759 N.Y.S.2d 344, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5684

This text of 305 A.D.2d 523 (Airline Cleaning & Maintenance Service, Inc. v. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Airline Cleaning & Maintenance Service, Inc. v. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., 305 A.D.2d 523, 759 N.Y.S.2d 344, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5684 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), entered January 11, 2002, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant, Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. (hereinafter C & W), to recover money allegedly due and owing for janitorial services. The Supreme Court granted a motion by C & W for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. We affirm.

[524]*524In support of its motion, C & W demonstrated its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by proffering evidence that its relationship with the plaintiff was that of an agent acting on behalf of a disclosed principal (the New York Dormitory Authority), and that there was no intention that it would assume any individual liability to the plaintiff for the services rendered (see Savoy Record Co. v Cardinal Export Corp., 15 NY2d 1 [1964]; Mencher v Weiss, 306 NY 1 [1953]; Peckham Rd. Corp. v Town of Putnam Val., 218 AD2d 789 [1995]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Ritter, J.P., Smith, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Savoy Record Co. v. Cardinal Export Corp.
203 N.E.2d 206 (New York Court of Appeals, 1964)
Mencher v. Weiss
114 N.E.2d 177 (New York Court of Appeals, 1953)
Peckham Road Corp. v. Town of Putnam Valley
218 A.D.2d 789 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
305 A.D.2d 523, 759 N.Y.S.2d 344, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/airline-cleaning-maintenance-service-inc-v-cushman-wakefield-inc-nyappdiv-2003.