Airey v. Buchanan

64 Miss. 181
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1886
StatusPublished

This text of 64 Miss. 181 (Airey v. Buchanan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Airey v. Buchanan, 64 Miss. 181 (Mich. 1886).

Opinion

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In Adams v. Dees, 62 Miss. 354, the exemptionist had converted his homestead into a garnishable debt due to-himself, and afterward invested that debt, which his judgment-creditor had a right to pursue, in a purchase in the name of his wife, and we held that a court of chancery should aid the creditor to reach the assets of his debtor, and apply them to the- judgment uninfluenced by the fact that the debt arose from a sale of the homestead, since the statute did not exempt the proceeds of a homestead.

In this case the defendant in the judgment did not have a debt due him for a sale of the homestead, and did not have title to the land conveyed in payment for his homestead, but conveyed his homestead for a conveyance of other real estate to his wife. This he had the right to do. The case is plainly distinguishable from that cited.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John I. Adams & Co. v. Dees
62 Miss. 354 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 Miss. 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/airey-v-buchanan-miss-1886.