Aircraft Taxi Co. v. Ford
This text of 272 So. 2d 7 (Aircraft Taxi Co. v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff was awarded a jury verdict for $385.00 as damages in a negligence action. The verdict was in the exact amount of plaintiff’s medical expenses. The trial judge granted plaintiff’s motion for a new trial “for the reason that the Jury verdict was contrary to the evidence.” We construe the ground expressed by the trial judge to be the same as a determination that the jury verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence. The defendant has appealed. We affirm upon the basis of the holding in Grossman v. Short, Fla.App. 1970, 235 So.2d 11.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 So. 2d 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aircraft-taxi-co-v-ford-fladistctapp-1973.