Airborne Express, Inc. F/K/A Airborne Freight Corporation, Now Known as DHL Express (USA), Inc., (APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE) v. Latin American Courier, Inc. and Pegaso Express S.A. De C v. (APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS)

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 22, 2006
Docket04-06-00662-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Airborne Express, Inc. F/K/A Airborne Freight Corporation, Now Known as DHL Express (USA), Inc., (APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE) v. Latin American Courier, Inc. and Pegaso Express S.A. De C v. (APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS) (Airborne Express, Inc. F/K/A Airborne Freight Corporation, Now Known as DHL Express (USA), Inc., (APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE) v. Latin American Courier, Inc. and Pegaso Express S.A. De C v. (APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Airborne Express, Inc. F/K/A Airborne Freight Corporation, Now Known as DHL Express (USA), Inc., (APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE) v. Latin American Courier, Inc. and Pegaso Express S.A. De C v. (APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS), (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-06-00662-CV

AIRBORNE EXPRESS, INC. f/k/a Airborne Freight Corporation,

now known as DHL Express (USA), Inc.,

Appellant

v.

LATIN AMERICAN COURIER, INC., AND PEGASO EXPRESS S.A. DE C.V.,

Appellees

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2004-CI-03951

Honorable Janet P. Littlejohn, Judge Presiding



PER CURIAM

Sitting: Alma L. López , Chief Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin , Justice

Rebecca Simmons , Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 22, 2006

VACATED and DISMISSED

The parties have filed a joint motion stating they have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences in this case. They request that this court render judgment effectuating the parties' settlement agreement by vacating the trial court's judgment, and dismissing the case. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). The motion is granted. The trial court's judgment signed on June 29, 2006 is vacated, and the case is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A), 43.2(e). Costs of appeal are taxed against the parties who have incurred them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Airborne Express, Inc. F/K/A Airborne Freight Corporation, Now Known as DHL Express (USA), Inc., (APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE) v. Latin American Courier, Inc. and Pegaso Express S.A. De C v. (APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/airborne-express-inc-fka-airborne-freight-corporation-now-known-as-dhl-texapp-2006.