Airall v. State

852 So. 2d 329, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11749, 2003 WL 21800806
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 6, 2003
DocketNo. 4D03-1925
StatusPublished

This text of 852 So. 2d 329 (Airall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Airall v. State, 852 So. 2d 329, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11749, 2003 WL 21800806 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ekon Airall seeks review of an order that dismissed his rule 3.850 as lacking a proper oath, and form. We accept the state’s concession and reverse and remand for the trial court to consider Airall’s properly filed motion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987.

GUNTHER, SHAHOOD and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
852 So. 2d 329, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11749, 2003 WL 21800806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/airall-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.