Air Stream Corp. v. 3300 Lawson Corp.

967 N.E.2d 700, 18 N.Y.3d 972
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 3, 2012·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and case remitted to the Appellate Division, [974]*974Second Department, for further proceedings in accordance with the principles of law expressed in Estate of Becker v Murtagh (19 NY3d 75 [2012] [decided today]). Because the legal standards Supreme Court employed were consonant with our decision in Becker, we remit to the Appellate Division rather than Supreme Court. Thus, the Appellate Division, in reviewing Supreme Court’s judgment, should now apply the facts of this case to the law as expressed in Becker.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Air Stream Corp. v. 3300 Lawson Corp., 967 N.E.2d 700, 18 N.Y.3d 972 (N.Y. 2012).

967 N.E.2d 700 (Air Stream Corp. v. 3300 Lawson Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Air Stream Corp. v. 3300 Lawson Corp.
99 A.D.3d 822 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
CSC Acquisition-NY, Inc. v. 404 County Road 39A, Inc.
96 A.D.3d 986 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)