Air-Sea Forwarders, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Air-Sea Forwarders, Inc. v. United States

55 Cust. Ct. 407, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1718

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedAugust 5, 1965

DocketNo. 69499; protest 64/1032 (Los Angeles)

StatusPublished

This text of 55 Cust. Ct. 407 (Air-Sea Forwarders, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Air-Sea Forwarders, Inc. v. United States, 55 Cust. Ct. 407, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1718 (cusc 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise was manufactured in the United States and returned to the United States from abroad without having been advanced in value or improved in condition and that the applicable customs regulations have now been complied with, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. Bertrand Freres, Inc., et al. v. United States (47 Cust. Ct. 155, C.D. 2296), followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise was manufactured in the United States and returned to the United States from abroad without having been advanced in value or improved in condition and that the applicable customs regulations have now been complied with, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. Bertrand Freres, Inc., et al. v. United States (47 Cust. Ct. 155, C.D. 2296), followed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 Cust. Ct. 407, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/air-sea-forwarders-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack