Air Express Int'l Agency, Inc. v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 610
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Air Express Int'l Agency, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 46 Cust. Ct. 163
United States Customs Court·Decided April 21, 1959·No. Reap. Dec. 9400; Entry Nos. M 124; M 883·Published

Opinion

Rao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed above relate to several importations of bamboo blind material and cotton tape, which were entered at their respective invoiced unit values, packing included. In making his return of value, the appraiser added to the invoiced unit values, net packed, charges for inland freight, storage, insurance, hauling, and lighterage, as invoiced.

When these cases were called for trial, the respective parties hereto orally agreed that the manufacturer’s ex-factory prices, as represented by the entered values, constituted the proper values of the involved merchandise.

Based upon the agreed facts, I find the entered values to be the proper values for the merchandise here involved.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Air Express Int'l Agency, Inc. v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 610 (cusc 1959).

42 Cust. Ct. 610 (Air Express Int'l Agency, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.