Air Express Int'l Agency, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Air Express Int'l Agency, Inc. v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 610

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 21, 1959

DocketReap. Dec. 9400; Entry Nos. M 124; M 883

StatusPublished

This text of 42 Cust. Ct. 610 (Air Express Int'l Agency, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Air Express Int'l Agency, Inc. v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 610 (cusc 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Rao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed above relate to several importations of bamboo blind material and cotton tape, which were entered at their respective invoiced unit values, packing included. In making his return of value, the appraiser added to the invoiced unit values, net packed, charges for inland freight, storage, insurance, hauling, and lighterage, as invoiced.

When these cases were called for trial, the respective parties hereto orally agreed that the manufacturer’s ex-factory prices, as represented by the entered values, constituted the proper values of the involved merchandise.

Based upon the agreed facts, I find the entered values to be the proper values for the merchandise here involved.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed above relate to several importations of bamboo blind material and cotton tape, which were entered at their respective invoiced unit values, packing included. In making his return of value, the appraiser added to the invoiced unit values, net packed, charges for inland freight, storage, insurance, hauling, and lighterage, as invoiced.

When these cases were called for trial, the respective parties hereto orally agreed that the manufacturer’s ex-factory prices, as represented by the entered values, constituted the proper values of the involved merchandise.

Based upon the agreed facts, I find the entered values to be the proper values for the merchandise here involved.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 Cust. Ct. 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/air-express-intl-agency-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1959.