Air Express International Corporation, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent. v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner

670 F.2d 512, 109 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3174, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 21010
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 15, 1982
Docket79-3776
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 670 F.2d 512 (Air Express International Corporation, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent. v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Air Express International Corporation, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent. v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner, 670 F.2d 512, 109 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3174, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 21010 (5th Cir. 1982).

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

The court has reconsidered the mandate in its opinion 659 F.2d 610, in the light of cross-motions for entry of judgment. It concludes that it is not necessary to vacate the National Labor Relations Board’s order and to remand the case. Instead, it is sufficient that the order of the Board be ENFORCED but in conformity with the opinion of this court. The last paragraph of our opinion, containing the mandate, is deleted and the following substituted in lieu thereof:

ENFORCED but in conformity with the foregoing opinion of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watson v. Moeller Rubber Products, Inc.
792 F. Supp. 1459 (N.D. Mississippi, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
670 F.2d 512, 109 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3174, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 21010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/air-express-international-corporation-petitioner-cross-respondent-v-ca5-1982.