Air Express International Agency, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Air Express International Agency, Inc. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 489

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 30, 1957

DocketNo. 60714; protest 180597-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 38 Cust. Ct. 489 (Air Express International Agency, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Air Express International Agency, Inc. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 489 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From the testimony, it appeared that an aircraft was flown to Canada, together with parts for assembly therein. When it was returned, entry was made covering the airplane and the parts, some 400 items. Counsel for the plaintiff abandoned the claim for free entry of 25 items, described on the invoice as set forth in the schedule “A,” attached to and made a part of the decision. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the remaining items were manufactures or products of the United States, having been returned to the United States after having been exported, without having been advanced in value or improved in condition, and that all of the applicable customs regulations had been complied with, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained as to said items.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From the testimony, it appeared that an aircraft was flown to Canada, together with parts for assembly therein. When it was returned, entry was made covering the airplane and the parts, some 400 items. Counsel for the plaintiff abandoned the claim for free entry of 25 items, described on the invoice as set forth in the schedule “A,” attached to and made a part of the decision. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the remaining items were manufactures or products of the United States, having been returned to the United States after having been exported, without having been advanced in value or improved in condition, and that all of the applicable customs regulations had been complied with, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained as to said items.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 Cust. Ct. 489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/air-express-international-agency-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1957.