Aipoalani v. Derr

CourtDistrict Court, D. Hawaii
DecidedMarch 10, 2022
Docket1:22-cv-00093
StatusUnknown

This text of Aipoalani v. Derr (Aipoalani v. Derr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Hawaii primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aipoalani v. Derr, (D. Haw. 2022).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII HANALEI YUKUTARU AIPOALANI, CIVIL NO. 22-00093 DKW-RT #53121-509, ORDER DENYING APPLICATION Plaintiff, TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BY A PRISONER vs.

ESTELLA DERR, et al.,

Defendants.

Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Hanalei Yukutaru Aipoalani’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner (“IFP Application”).1 ECF No. 2. Aipoalani’s IFP Application is DENIED as incomplete. When bringing an action, a prisoner must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and a $52.00 administrative fee in a lump sum or, if granted the privilege of proceeding in forma pauperis, pay the $350.00 filing fee incrementally as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). An application to proceed in forma pauperis requires an (1) affidavit of indigence and (2) a certified copy of the inmate’s trust account statement for the six months preceding the filing of the complaint. See 28 U.S.C.

1Aipoalani is currently incarcerated at the Federal Detention Center, Honolulu. See Federal Bureau of Prisons, https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/ (select “Find By Name”; enter “Hanalei” in “First” field and “Aipoalani” in “Last” field; and select “Search”) (last visited Mar. 10, 2022). § 1915(a)(2); Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1139 (9th Cir. 2000). A prisoner must submit trust account statements from each institution where confined during

this six-month period. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). To assist prisoners in meeting these statutory requirements, the Court

requires the use of a form application—that is, the “Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner.” See United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, https://www.hid.uscourts.gov/dsp_accord.cfm (follow “Forms You Need to Complete to File a New Case”). This form includes (1) an affidavit of indigence

(for completion by the prisoner); (2) a financial certificate and consent to collection of fees (for completion by the prisoner); and (3) a certificate (for completion by the warden or other appropriate officer of the institution in which

the prisoner is confined). See id. The form also reminds the prison official to attach a copy of the prisoner’s trust account balance statements for the preceding six months. See id.

If a prisoner is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court will assess an initial partial filing fee of twenty percent of either the average monthly deposits or the average monthly balance in the prisoner’s account, whichever is

greater. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1); Bruce v. Samuels, 577 U.S. 82, 84 (2016). An initial partial filing fee will only be collected when funds exist. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). The balance of the $350.00 filing fee will be collected in monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month’s income credited to the prisoner’s account, each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(b)(2); Bruce, 577 U.S. at 84. These payments continue until the filing fee is paid in full. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The initial partial filing fee and the subsequent monthly installment payments are assessed on a per-case basis. Bruce,

577 U.S. at 84. Thus, filing fees associated with multiple actions are recouped simultaneously, not sequentially. See id. Aipoalani’s IFP Application is incomplete. Specifically, the IFP Application

does not include: (1) a certificate (for completion by the warden or other appropriate officer of the institution in which the prisoner is confined); and (2) an account statement for the preceding six months showing all deposits to and

withdrawals from Aipoalani’s account during that period. See ECF No. 2. Aipoalani is DIRECTED to promptly submit these missing documents to enable the Court to fully assess the IFP Application. Failure to do so, or to pay the filing

fee in full, on or before March 31, 2022, will result in automatic dismissal of this suit without prejudice and without further notice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also Olivares v. Marshall, 59 F.3d 109, 112 (9th Cir. 1995). The Court will take

no action on any pending or future filings in this action until Aipoalani addresses the deficiencies set forth in this Order. CONCLUSION

(1) Aipoalani’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner is DENIED without prejudice as incomplete.

(2) Atpoalani is DIRECTED to pay the filing fee in full, or to submit a complete IFP Application that includes the missing documentation described above, on or before March 31, 2022.

(3) The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Aipoalani an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner to facilitate compliance with this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 10, 2022 at Honolulu, Hawaii.

TES DIST, 4 & ‘k BS eo, Ss & /s/ Derrick K. Watson VP or Derrick K. Watson iM United States District Judge

Hanalei Y. Aipoalani v. Estella Derr, et al.; Civil No. 22-00093 DK W-RT; ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BY A PRISONER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bruce v. Samuels
577 U.S. 82 (Supreme Court, 2016)
Olivares v. Marshall
59 F.3d 109 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
Page v. Torrey
201 F.3d 1136 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Aipoalani v. Derr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aipoalani-v-derr-hid-2022.