Ainsworth v. Sessions

1 Root 175
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided March 15, 1790·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

Although the objection in the plea is conclusive in all cases where it applies; but where a party is deprived of his most material evidence by some unaccountable •cause, as by being panic struck, or by a paralytic shock, or other affection which for that time, has deranged the recollection of the witness so that the party loses the benefit of his testimony; this appealing clearly to be the case, reason and justice require that the party should be relieved against such a misfortune, by a new trial, as much as when he is deprived of his evidence by sickness or absence; but in such cases the court ought to be extremely cautious, that they be not imposed upon; this case was afterwards heard upon the merits, and a new trial granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ainsworth v. Sessions, 1 Root 175 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).

1 Root 175 (Ainsworth v. Sessions) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shields v. State
45 Conn. 266 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1877)
Jenks v. State
39 Ind. 1 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1872)