Ainsworth v. Sessions

1 Root 175
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1790
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Root 175 (Ainsworth v. Sessions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ainsworth v. Sessions, 1 Root 175 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).

Opinion

By the Court.

Although the objection in the plea is conclusive in all cases where it applies; but where a party is deprived of his most material evidence by some unaccountable •cause, as by being panic struck, or by a paralytic shock, or other affection which for that time, has deranged the recollection of the witness so that the party loses the benefit of his testimony; this appealing clearly to be the case, reason and justice require that the party should be relieved against such a misfortune, by a new trial, as much as when he is deprived of his evidence by sickness or absence; but in such cases the court ought to be extremely cautious, that they be not imposed upon; this case was afterwards heard upon the merits, and a new trial granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shields v. State
45 Conn. 266 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1877)
Jenks v. State
39 Ind. 1 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Root 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ainsworth-v-sessions-connsuperct-1790.