Ainsworth v. Boykin

Mississippi Supreme Court

Ainsworth v. Boykin

23 So. 2d 297, 198 Miss. 756, 1945 Miss. LEXIS 243

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 24, 1945

DocketNo. 35908.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 23 So. 2d 297 (Ainsworth v. Boykin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ainsworth v. Boykin, 23 So. 2d 297, 198 Miss. 756, 1945 Miss. LEXIS 243 (Mich. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Griffith, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The mother of a young child, whose father is dead, has the right to the custody of the child unless (1) she is' morally unfit or otherwise unsuitable, or unless (2) she has abandoned the child. This rule as to the right of a parent is settled by a long line of decisions in this state, among which are Stegall v. Stegall, 151 Miss. 875, 119 So. 802, and Nickle v. Burnett, 122 Miss. 56, 84 So. 138. It is not seriously controverted in this case that the mother is in every way fit, able, and anxious, in which she is joined by her present husband.

What it takes to constitute abandonment is accurately stated in Amis on Divorce and Separation, Sec. 216, ap *759 proved by this Court iu McAdams v. McFerron, 180 Miss. 644, 654, 178 So. 333. The proof in this case not only falls far short of showing an abandonment under the approved rule, but, on the contrary, it affirmatively discloses that there was no abandonment. ' Moreover, the foregoing considerations aside, we think the whole record shows by a manifest preponderance, in fact beyond a reasonable doubt, that the present situation, as well as the future prospects thereof, is such that the best interests of this child will be served by his being permanently committed solely to the custody of his mother; and this will be the judgment entered by this Court.

Reversed and judgment here for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffith, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The mother of a young child, whose father is dead, has the right to the custody of the child unless (1) she is' morally unfit or otherwise unsuitable, or unless (2) she has abandoned the child. This rule as to the right of a parent is settled by a long line of decisions in this state, among which are Stegall v. Stegall, 151 Miss. 875, 119 So. 802, and Nickle v. Burnett, 122 Miss. 56, 84 So. 138. It is not seriously controverted in this case that the mother is in every way fit, able, and anxious, in which she is joined by her present husband.

What it takes to constitute abandonment is accurately stated in Amis on Divorce and Separation, Sec. 216, ap *759 proved by this Court iu McAdams v. McFerron, 180 Miss. 644, 654, 178 So. 333. The proof in this case not only falls far short of showing an abandonment under the approved rule, but, on the contrary, it affirmatively discloses that there was no abandonment. ' Moreover, the foregoing considerations aside, we think the whole record shows by a manifest preponderance, in fact beyond a reasonable doubt, that the present situation, as well as the future prospects thereof, is such that the best interests of this child will be served by his being permanently committed solely to the custody of his mother; and this will be the judgment entered by this Court.

Reversed and judgment here for appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 So. 2d 297, 198 Miss. 756, 1945 Miss. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ainsworth-v-boykin-miss-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack