Ainsworth v. Atkinson
This text of 14 Ind. 538 (Ainsworth v. Atkinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Suit to enforce a mechanic’s lien upon real estate. The amount for which a lien was claimed was less than fifty dollars. It was claimed that, therefore, the [539]*539Common Pleas had not jurisdiction; that the suit should have been brought before a justice of the peace.
But a suit to enforce a lien upon real estate is in the nature of a suit to foreclose a mortgage, a proceeding in chancery under the former practice, and is not embraced by the section of the code (2 R. S. p. 451, § 10,) conferring civil jurisdiction upon justices. Perk. Pr., p. 639.
The defendant answered, that the property on which the lien was sought to be enforced was then owned by a third person, but did not deny the ownership of the defendant at the time the lien attached.
This answer was no defense.
The judgment is affirmed with 10 per cent, damages and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 Ind. 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ainsworth-v-atkinson-ind-1860.