Aine v. Goldberg
This text of 10 A.D.2d 573 (Aine v. Goldberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion to vacate the notice of examination before trial granted, with $10 costs. The complaint is unverified and most of the operative allegations are stated on information and belief. There is a failure to comply with subdivision 7 of rule XI of the New York County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules, with respect to establishing special circumstances. (Van Aalten v. Mack, 7 A D 2d 289.) Concur — M. M. Frank, J. P., Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 A.D.2d 573, 195 N.Y.S.2d 700, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aine-v-goldberg-nyappdiv-1960.