Ain v. Three School Street

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ain v. Three School Street

8 A.D.3d 413, 778 N.Y.S.2d 308, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8477

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 A.D.3d 413 (Ain v. Three School Street) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ain v. Three School Street, 8 A.D.3d 413, 778 N.Y.S.2d 308, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8477 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), dated October 15, 2003, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability, finding the plaintiff Jacob Ain 40% at fault and it 60% at fault in the happening of the accident, and upon the denial of its motion pursuant to CELR 4404 (a), to set aside the verdict and for judgment in its favor as a matter of law, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against it.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the evidence did not support the conclusion that the elevation between two surfaces of the sidewalk, upon which the injured plaintiff tripped and fell, was a defect too trivial to be actionable (see Smith v A.B.K. Apts., 284 AD2d 323 [2001]; Sanna v Wal-Mart Stores, 271 AD2d 595 [2000]; Nin v Bernard, 257 AD2d 417 [1999]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), dated October 15, 2003, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability, finding the plaintiff Jacob Ain 40% at fault and it 60% at fault in the happening of the accident, and upon the denial of its motion pursuant to CELR 4404 (a), to set aside the verdict and for judgment in its favor as a matter of law, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against it.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the evidence did not support the conclusion that the elevation between two surfaces of the sidewalk, upon which the injured plaintiff tripped and fell, was a defect too trivial to be actionable (see Smith v A.B.K. Apts., 284 AD2d 323 [2001]; Sanna v Wal-Mart Stores, 271 AD2d 595 [2000]; Nin v Bernard, 257 AD2d 417 [1999]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.3d 413, 778 N.Y.S.2d 308, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ain-v-three-school-street-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack