Aimcor, Alabama Silicon, Inc. v. United States

20 Ct. Int'l Trade 94
CourtUnited States Court of International Trade
DecidedJanuary 4, 1996
DocketConsolidated Court No. 93-06-00322
StatusPublished

This text of 20 Ct. Int'l Trade 94 (Aimcor, Alabama Silicon, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aimcor, Alabama Silicon, Inc. v. United States, 20 Ct. Int'l Trade 94 (cit 1996).

Opinion

ORDER

DiCarlo, Chief Judge:

Upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ motion for judgment upon the agency record pursuant to Rule 56.2 of the Rules of this court, Defendant’s and Defendant-Intervenor’s responses thereto, and the agency record, it is hereby

Ordered that Plaintiffs’ motion for judgment upon the agency record is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that Commerce’s final countervailing duty determination is remanded in accordance with the instructions set forth in Aimcor v. United States, Slip-Op. 95-210 (Dec. 29, 1995); and it is further

Ordered that the remand results shall be filed with the court within 60 days from the date of this order. Any party contesting the remand results shall file comments within 30 days of the remand results. Commerce may file its response to any comments within 15 days of the filing of the comments.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Ct. Int'l Trade 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aimcor-alabama-silicon-inc-v-united-states-cit-1996.