Ailes v. Michigan Motor Freight, Inc.

136 N.E.2d 160, 72 Ohio Law. Abs. 402, 1952 Ohio App. LEXIS 822
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 3, 1952
DocketNo. 168
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 136 N.E.2d 160 (Ailes v. Michigan Motor Freight, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ailes v. Michigan Motor Freight, Inc., 136 N.E.2d 160, 72 Ohio Law. Abs. 402, 1952 Ohio App. LEXIS 822 (Ohio Ct. App. 1952).

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT:

Submitted on application for rehearing. The appellant has filed an affidavit, the substance of which is that one of the counsel for appel[403]*403lant had sickness in his home during the period that the assignments of error and brief were required to be filed. The record shows that two separate law offices were associated in representing the appellant and there is no showing that at least one of the counsel could not have filed the papers within the time required by rule.

The application for rehearing is overruled on the authority of Anderson v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, 135 Oh St 77.

HORNBECK, PJ, WISEMAN and MILLER, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mayse v. Shannon Buick Co.
175 N.E.2d 207 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 N.E.2d 160, 72 Ohio Law. Abs. 402, 1952 Ohio App. LEXIS 822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ailes-v-michigan-motor-freight-inc-ohioctapp-1952.