Ailep v. State

802 So. 2d 514, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18557, 2001 WL 1671035
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 26, 2001·No. No. 3D00-1736·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla.1996); Barfield v. State, 762 So.2d 564 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); Bateson v. [515] State, 761 So.2d 1165 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Carinda v. State, 734 So.2d 514 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); State v. Wilson, 686 So.2d 569 (Fla.1996); Blattman v. Williams Island Assoc., Ltd., 592 So.2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ailep v. State, 802 So. 2d 514, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18557, 2001 WL 1671035 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

802 So. 2d 514 (Ailep v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Melbourne v. State
679 So. 2d 759 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
State v. Wilson
686 So. 2d 569 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Barfield v. State
762 So. 2d 564 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Bateson v. State
761 So. 2d 1165 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Blattman v. Williams Island Associates, Ltd.
592 So. 2d 269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Carinda v. State
734 So. 2d 514 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)