Aikin v. Cooper

Supreme Court of Georgia

Aikin v. Cooper

211 S.E.2d 740, 233 Ga. 448, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 1337

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 7, 1975

Docket29406

StatusPublished

This text of 211 S.E.2d 740 (Aikin v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aikin v. Cooper, 211 S.E.2d 740, 233 Ga. 448, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 1337 (Ga. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Hall, Justice.

Aikin appeals, without enumerating errors, from the decision of the Putnam County Superior Court remanding [449]*449him to custody following a hearing on his habeas corpus petition. Review of the record and of the habeas corpus transcript shows that the findings of the superior court adverse to Aikin’s claims were supported by the evidence (Allen v. Caldwell, 231 Ga. 442, 443 (202 SE2d 35)), and that the superior court committed no error of law. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the comprehensive opinion of the superior court.

Submitted November 22, 1974 — Decided January 7, 1975. Harry J. Aikin, pro se. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, John W. Dunsmore, Jr., Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Hill, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall, Justice.

Aikin appeals, without enumerating errors, from the decision of the Putnam County Superior Court remanding [449]*449him to custody following a hearing on his habeas corpus petition. Review of the record and of the habeas corpus transcript shows that the findings of the superior court adverse to Aikin’s claims were supported by the evidence (Allen v. Caldwell, 231 Ga. 442, 443 (202 SE2d 35)), and that the superior court committed no error of law. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the comprehensive opinion of the superior court.

Submitted November 22, 1974 — Decided January 7, 1975. Harry J. Aikin, pro se. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, John W. Dunsmore, Jr., Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Hill, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 S.E.2d 740, 233 Ga. 448, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 1337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aikin-v-cooper-ga-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack