Aikens v. State
85 S.W.3d 120, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1924, 2002 WL 31107005
Opinion
ORDER
Levar Aikens appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 Motion following an evidentiary hearing. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Aikens v. State, 85 S.W.3d 120, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1924, 2002 WL 31107005 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).
85 S.W.3d 120 (Aikens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Langley
232 S.W.3d 363 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007)