Aikens v. State

85 S.W.3d 120, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1924, 2002 WL 31107005
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 24, 2002
DocketNo. WD 60294
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 85 S.W.3d 120 (Aikens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aikens v. State, 85 S.W.3d 120, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1924, 2002 WL 31107005 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Levar Aikens appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 Motion following an evidentiary hearing. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Langley
232 S.W.3d 363 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 S.W.3d 120, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1924, 2002 WL 31107005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aikens-v-state-moctapp-2002.