Aiken v. White

68 S.E.2d 149, 208 Ga. 572, 1951 Ga. LEXIS 436
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 13, 1951
DocketNo. 17633
StatusPublished

This text of 68 S.E.2d 149 (Aiken v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aiken v. White, 68 S.E.2d 149, 208 Ga. 572, 1951 Ga. LEXIS 436 (Ga. 1951).

Opinion

Head, Justice.

1. Trust estates may be created for the benefit of minors. Code, § 108-114. A claim against a trust estate for services or for articles or money furnished to the trust. estate may be enforced in either a court of law or a court of equity. §§ 108-501, 108-506. But in order to subject a trust estate to an obligation, the specific facts which render it liable for the debt claimed must be alleged and established by evidence. Gaudy v. Babbitt, 56 Ga. 640. In the present case, the petitioner alleged that the money loaned by her was used by White for the purchase of the Thomas Street property, included in the deed of trust. This allegation was denied by both defendants, and there was no evidence that any part of the proceeds of such loan went into the purchase of the Thomas street property. Accordingly, the petitioner was not entitled to a special lien against the trust property upon the theory that money advanced by her had been used in the purchase of such property.

2. The amended motion for new trial contains six grounds, each attacking an extract from the charge of the court. The charge fairly and impartially submitted to the jury the issues made by the pleadings and evidence, and, when considered as a whole, was free of error. The jury by their verdict have determined that the petitioner was not entitled to assert a lien having priority over thé deed of trust, and this finding by the jury is not without evidence to support it. The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial as amended.

Judgment ajjirmed.

All the Justices concur. Edwin Fortson and W. T. Ray, for plaintiff. Rupert A. Brown, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gaudy v. Babbitt
56 Ga. 640 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1876)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 S.E.2d 149, 208 Ga. 572, 1951 Ga. LEXIS 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aiken-v-white-ga-1951.